Posts

Showing posts with the label CTR: 1914

A Clearer Examination of Claims About Russell, the Great Pyramid and “Occultism”

Image

Russell Was Never the President of the Jehovah's Witnesses

Image

Russell, the JWs and the Great Pyramid - Video Reply (w)

The World Magazine and the Alleged 28 Year Old Prophecy

Image

JW Claims and Russell's Expectations Regarding 1914

Image

Some Early Quotes Regarding 1914

Image

* Did Russell Change the End of the Gentile Times to 1915?

Image

Did Russell "Await the Rapture" On the Mount of Olives?

Image

* Did Russell Claim that the Gentile Times Had Not Ended in 1914?

Image

Reply to: Alleged "Dark Secrets" Video (Working On)

CTR’s Expectations Concerning 1914 (Working On)

Image

Russell's Alleged "Pyramid Scheme"

Image

Is 1914 Based on Measurements of Pyramids? (Working on)

Image

Did Russell Predict that Christ Was to Return in 1874, 1878, 1914, 1915?

Image

Was Russell Expecting History to End in 1914, 1918 or 1925?

Image

The JW Organization, Armageddon, 1914, and Russell (Editing)

Image

Armageddon will be in 1914 or 1915?

Image

Did Russell Claim to be a Prophet?

Image

Discussing Charles Taze Russell (Video Response)

Clarifying the 1905 Pyramid Measurement Change in Thy Kingdom Come

Image
A frequently repeated accusation states something like the following: Russell supposedly calculated 1914 from pyramid measurements He allegedly predicted the “end of the world” for 1914 When the prediction “failed,” he supposedly altered the pyramid measurements in later editions of Thy Kingdom Come to cover his tracks This narrative is misleading on several levels. The Alleged “Growing Pyramid” Critics often compare the 1897 edition of Thy Kingdom Come with a later edition (sometimes 1916, 1918, or even 1923) and note that a measurement of 3416 inches was later printed as 3457 inches , claiming the pyramid “grew” 41 inches in 19 years. However, this comparison ignores a crucial fact: The measurement change first appeared in the 1905 edition—nine years before 1914. This means the change had nothing to do with 1914 “failing,” nor was it an attempt to hide anything. Many who repeat the accusation are likely unaware of the 1905 edition; whoever originally framed the argume...