Tuesday, May 09, 2023

The Meaning of "Hell" (Editing)

What does the English word “hell” mean, and how does this relate to the Biblical Hebrew and Greek words from which "hell" is translated (or mistranslated)?




Many may wonder why we would want to consider such a topic. Some may think the topic is too horrid to be discussed. Many simply do not wish to think about the hell of the Bible, due to the fact that the common concept of hell often brings a feeling of dread. Such may be aware that Jesus said the road to life is cramped and narrow and, since they are prone to sin, they might think that they will spend an eternity in conscious suffering in hell because they fail to walk on that narrow path. We encourage any who may think such as this to read on.

(2) Some others may be concerned about their loved ones, their children, their spouses, or friends who may have not yet accepted Jesus, and thus they feel overwhelmed at the thought that these may be without being saved from the horrible condition that the word "hell" often brings to their mind. Indeed, many may even be concerned about their loved ones who have passed on without accepting Jesus, and to them, the word "hell" may bring forth thoughts of how their loved ones must be in great agony.

(3) We do believe that the idea of hell as often presented and accepted is a horrid one; however, we believe that such a view of hell does contribute to diminishing understanding of the love, power, and wisdom of God, which is found in the Word of God. So one may wonder what the scriptures actually do say, remembering that in God's Word we find "revealed a righteousness of God from faith to faith.” (Romans 1:17) At the same time we realize that the Bible tells us that “the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hinder the truth in unrighteousness” (Romans 1:18), and “most assuredly, the evil man will not be unpunished”, (Proverbs 11:21) Nevertheless, we should also understand the wrath of God is always just, and tempered with mercy. “His lovingkindness endures forever.” (Psalm 106:1; 107:1; 118:1-4; 136) Many realize that there must be something very wrong with the traditional idea of God's punishment of the wicked. Some, believing that the Bible teaches that all who die without Christ are suffering for eternity in unimaginable pain have actually turned away from the Bible. And yet the Bible, while upholding God's wisdom and his justice in regard to the punishment of the wicked, is harmonious with God's righteousness and His love for His creatures. We believe, however, that the Bible does not present God as demanding that those who die lost in sin will spend an eternity in suffering, we hope to show from the Bible itself that it is in harmony with God's love, wisdom, power as well as His justice. 

YOU ARE GOD

From everlasting you are God!
The “high and lofty one.”
For you alone did live before
Creation was begun.

Your wisdom, justice, love and power
As yet had not been known,
For in a realm of endless space,
There you did dwell alone.

Your glory and your majesty
You so desire to share,
And so you did create your Son,
None with him could compare.

Then by your power and through your Son
All things created came,
And with one breath they glorified
Your great and holy name.

We worship your our Father, God,
And your beloved Son
Who at your word fulfills your plan,
In purpose you are one.

(4) Sadly, we live in a time when the Bible is being discredited by many, and its pages are constantly being challenged by many. Our educational systems endeavor to indoctrinate our children with teachings contrary to the Bible. The forms of entertainment provided for both adults and children often misrepresent the Bible as well as what the Bible says about life after death. One of the greatest stumbling blocks that are often presented is the teaching of eternal conscious torment, which many believe is what is taught in the Bible. We live in an age when the trustworthiness of the Bible is being challenged from many quarters. Many misunderstand scriptures such as Matthew 7:14, do claim the vast majority of mankind who have ever lived are now in a horrid place and being consciously tormented and will be tormented for every second for all eternity. Thus a correct understanding of this subject has become almost a necessity for Christian steadfastness. Many would try to soften this idea by making various exceptions for many who have died without Christ, but strictly speaking, if scriptures are applied to mean eternal conscious suffering, and if the idea read into the scriptures is that one must accept Christ before death or else be eternally condemned, then there could be no expectations. Such would mean that all the heathen who never hear of Christ and every child that dies without Christ are now eternally being consciously tormented. But is this what the Bible actually teaches?

(5) As we have noted, as many today learn to think and reason on this, they may see the teaching of eternal suffering for most people who have even lived as being a means of instilling fear into the people by those who would wish to subjugate the people under themselves. And it would certainly seem to them to be a hideous thing for anyone to do. Thus, some religious leaders have claimed that a hell of eternal torment exists, but they claim that the fire is not literal, but symbolic. Some claim that eternal punishment refers to the immortal soul of a human being eternally conscious of being separated from God. Some have rejected the idea of hell altogether. Thus today there are many opinions about hell. We hope, however, to show from the Bible the truth about hell; we realize, however, that the truth is not popular, and that most will not be able to accept what we present from the Bible as being true. We believe, however, that God will draw those who are earnestly seeking the truth to an appreciable understanding of what hell is and what it is not. We believe all others will remain under God's wrath, and may not fully understand until the day of judgment when all are to learn God's ways of righteousness. -- Isaiah 2:2-4; 26:9.

(6) Nevertheless, the minds of many Christian people have so long been taught that the foundation for this awful blasphemy against God’s character and government is the Bible. Many have become firmly convinced that this teaching is in the Word of God. Thus, as these realize how disgusting this doctrine is, and as they lose faith in what they have been taught about "hell", they correspondingly lose faith in the Bible itself. Many of these have openly become infidels and scoffers of the Bible.

(7) Through prayer for Jehovah’s guidance, and limiting ourselves to compare spiritual revealing with spiritual revealing as given in the Bible (2 Corinthians 2:10,13) rather than what many might "see" beyond what is written (1 Corinthians 4:6), we have come to a realization that the Bible has been slandered, as well as its divine Author, and that, rightly understood, it teaches nothing on this subject derogatory to God’s name and character. We will attempt to present here the Scripture teaching on this subject, that thereby faith in God and his Word may be well established in the hearts of his people, on a better, scriptural foundation. Indeed, we blelieve that anyone who comes to realize that that his false view rested upon human misconceptions and misinterpretations, will, at the same time, learn to trust hereafter less to his own and other men’s imaginings, and, by faith, to grasp more firmly the Word of God, which is able to make wise to salvation. --- 2 Timothy 3:15. -- ****** below needs to be edited.

(8) That the advocates of the doctrine of eternal torment have little or no faith in it is very manifest from the fact that most often it has no power over their course of action. While most of the major denominations of Christendom sustain the doctrine that eternal torment and endless, hopeless despair will constitute the punishment of the wicked, they are -- for the most part -- quite at ease in allowing the wicked to take their course, while they pursue the even tenor of their way. Chiming bells and pealing organs, artistic choirs, and costly edifices, and upholstered pews, and polished oratory which more and more avoids any reference to this alarming theme, afford rest and entertainment to fashionable congregations that gather on their day(s) set aside for worship and are known to the world as churches of Christ and representatives of his doctrines. But they seem little concerned about the eternal welfare of the multitudes, or even of themselves and their own families, though one would naturally presume that with such awful possibilities in view they would be almost frantic in their efforts to rescue the perishing.

(9) The plain inference is that they do not believe it. There are only a few out of Christendom's billions who to any degree show their faith in it by their works; and these are often the subjects of ridicule froml other Christians, because they are somewhat consistent with their belief. Yet even their peculiar, and often absurd, methods, so strikingly in contrast with those of the Lord of whom it was written, “He will not cry, nor lift up his voice, nor cause it to be heard in the street.” (Isaiah 42:2), are very mild compared with what might be expected if they were fully convinced of the doctrine. We cannot imagine how sincere believers of this terrible doctrine go from day to day about the ordinary affairs of life, or meet quietly in elegance every Sunday to hear an essay from the pulpit on the peculiar subjects often advertised. Could they do so while really believing all the time that fellow mortals are dying at the rate of thousands every day, and entering

“That lone land of deep despair,” where “No God regards their bitter prayer”?

(10) If they really believed this, few saints could complacently sit there and think of those hurrying every moment into that awful state described by that good, well-meaning, but greatly deluded man, Isaac Watts (whose own heart was immeasurably warmer and larger than that he ascribed to the Almighty Jehovah), when he wrote the hymn

“Tempests of angry fire shall roll
To blast the rebel worm,
And beat upon the naked soul
In one eternal storm.”

(11) People often become frantic with grief when friends have been caught in some terrible catastrophe, as a fire, or a car wreck, though they know they will soon be relieved by death; yet they pretend to believe that God is less loving than themselves, and that he can look with indifference, if not with delight, at billions of his creatures enduring an eternity of torture far more terrible, which he prepares for them and prevents any escape from forever. Not only so, but they, by misapplication of the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, as well as other scriptures, expect that they will get into Abraham’s bosom, and will then look across the gulf and see and hear the agonies of the multitudes (some of whom they now love and weep over); and they imagine that they will be so changed, and become so like their present idea of God, so hardened against all pity, and so barren of love and sympathy, that they will delight in such a God and in such a plan.

(12) It is wonderful that otherwise sensible men and women, who love their fellows, and who establish hospitals, orphanages, asylums, and societies for the prevention of cruelty even to the brute creation, are so unbalanced mentally that they can believe and subscribe to such a doctrine, and yet be so indifferent about investigating its authority!

(13) And there are those who hold to the ultra-Calvinistic doctrine. These believe that God has decreed it thus, that all the efforts they could put forth could not alter the result with a single person; and that all the prayers they could offer would not change one iota of the awful plan they believe God has marked out for his and their eternal pleasure. These indeed could sit still, so far as effort for their fellows is concerned: but why sing the praises of such a scheme for the damnation of their neighbors whom God has told them to love as themselves?

(14) Why not rather begin to doubt this ‘doctrine of demons' (1 Timothy 4:1); this blasphemy against the great God, brought into the church through apostasy (2 Thessalonians 2:3-8), at a time that a crafty priesthood taught that it is right to do evil that good may result? The teaching, in effect, soothes the itching ears of those who hate their enemies and would be happy to see their enemies cast into such a place. (2 Timothy 4:3,4; Matthew 5:44; Luke 6:35) At the same time, it soothes the ears of those who promote some visible system alleged to have authority to pronounce the judgments of God while the present evil age is in existence, providing and opportunity to use this doctrine as a club to “lord it over” the people, even killing others, believing that they doing a service to God. — Mark 10:42-44; John 16:2.

(15) The doctrine of eternal torture of human souls after death was undoubtedly brought into the apostasy as a result of blending Jewish fables in with the Bible; much of the Jewish fables, however, came from Hellenistic philosophy. One of those fables consisted of an afterlife in hades, where one could enjoy eternal bliss if he was a good person, or where one could be tortured in the subterranean fires. Many of the Jews blended this mythology into the Hebrew Scriptures respecting “sheol.” The doctrine certainly appealed to Papacy since it provided means to induce pagans to join her and support her system. It flourished at the same time that “bullfights” and gladiatorial contests were the public amusements most enjoyed; when the Crusades were called “holy wars,” and when men and women were called “heretics” (from a Biblical Greek word referring to one who promotes a sect or a division) and were often slaughtered for thinking or speaking contrary to the teachings of the Papacy; at a time when the sun of gospel truth was greatly darkened; when the Word of God had fallen into disuse and was prohibited to be read by any but the clergy, whose love of their neighbors was often shown in torturing “heretics” to induce them to recant and deny their faith and their Bibles. This was done supposedly to save them, if possible, they explained, from the more awful future ascribed to “heretics,” — eternal torture. The idea of hell as a place of torture after death for evil people probably came into the apostate Christian religion from heathen sources. The heathen philosophies, however, usually did not see their idea of "inferno" as torture for all eternity, but rather as a cycle of soul rebirth, and thus a kind of "purgatory". While the idea of torture after death was believed in by various heathens, we know of no heathen philosophy in the world that teaches a doctrine so cruel, so fiendish and so unjust, as is found in many protestant doctrines of today. Examining the scriptures without all of the added-on mythology and philosophy, and examining the scriptures closely in accordance with what the holy spirit has revealed, we realize that we have been deceived. Let us, then, whoever can, show the doctrine of demons up in all its blackness, that, if possible, it may be shown that the essence of barbarism, malice, hate, and ungodliness has not been exclusively appropriated by those whom God has most highly favored with light from every quarter, and to whom he has committed the only oracle — his Word. Oh! the shame and confusion that will cover the faces of many, even good men, who verily thought that they did God a service while propagating this blasphemous doctrine, when they awake in the resurrection, to learn of the love and justice of God, and when they come to know that the Bible does not teach this God-dishonoring, love-extinguishing, truth-beclouding, saint-hindering, sinner-hardening, “damnable heresy” of eternal torment. — 2 Peter 2:1.

(16) But we repeat that, in the light of moral awareness of this day, sensible people do not believe this doctrine. However, since they think that the Bible teaches it, every step they progress in real intelligence and brotherly kindness, which hinders belief in eternal torment, is in most cases a step away from God’s word, which is falsely accused of being the authority for this teaching. Hence the second crop of evil fruit, which the devil’s engraftment of this error is producing, is skepticism. The intelligent, honest thinkers are thus driven from the Bible into vain philosophies and sciences, falsely so-called (1 Timothy 6:20), and into infidelity. Nor do the “worldly” really believe this doctrine, nor is it a restraint to crime, for history shows that often convicts and the lower classes have been the firmest believers in it.

(17) But, says one, “Has not the error done some good? Have not many been brought into the churches by the preaching of this doctrine in the past?” No error, we answer, ever did real good, but always harm. Those whom error brings into a church, and whom the truth would not move, are an injury to the church. The thousands terrorized, but not at heart converted, which this doctrine forced into Papacy, and which swelled her numbers and her wealth, diluted what little truth was held before, and mingled it with their unholy sentiments and errors so that, to meet the changed condition of things, the “clergy” found it needful to add error to error, and resorted to methods, forms, etc., not taught in the Scriptures and useless to the truly converted whom the truth controls. Among these were pictures, images, beads, vestments, candles, grand cathedrals, altars, etc., to help the unconverted heathen to become false workers who profess Christ, but whose works are not authorized of Christ. — Luke 13:27.

(18) The heathen were not benefited, for they were still heathen in God’s sight, but were deluded into aping what they did not understand or do from the heart. They were added “tares” to choke the “wheat,” without being profited themselves. The Lord tells who sowed the seed of this enormous crop. (Matthew 13:39)The same is true of those who assume the name “Christian” today, who are not really at heart converted by the truth, but merely frightened by the error, or allured by promised earthly advantages of a social or business kind. Such add nothing to the true Church: by their ideas and manners they become stumbling blocks to the truly consecrated, and by their inability to digest the truth, the real food of the saints, they lead even the few true pastors to defraud the true “sheep” in order to satisfy the demands of these “goats” for something pleasing to their unconverted tastes. No: in no way has this error accomplished good except in the sense that God is able to make even the wrath of man to praise him. So also he will overrule this evil error eventually to serve his purposes. When by and by all men (during the Millennium) shall come to see through this great deception by which Satan has blinded the world to God’s true character, it will perhaps awaken in them a warmer, stronger love for God. Seeing, then, the unreasonableness of man’s view, let us lay aside human opinions and theories and come to the Word of God, the only authority on the subject, remembering that

“God is His own interpreter, and He will make it plain.”

“HELL,” AS AN ENGLISH WORD

(18) In the first place bear in mind that the Old Testament Scriptures were written in the ancient Hebrew language and the New Testament in Koine Greek. The word “hell” is an English word sometimes selected by translators to render forms of the Hebrew word often transliterated as sheol and forms of the Greek words often transliterated as hades, tartaroo, and gehenna. While sheol and hades mean the same throughout the Bible, with exception of its usage in Luke 16:23, tartaroo and gehenna as used in the Bible do not mean the same thing as sheol and hades, although many translators often render all these words with hell, and thus the English reader may not realize that not the same thing was being spoken of. The King James Version sometimes renders sheol as “grave” and “pit.” and it sometimes renders hades as grave, but we will discuss this later.

(19) The word “hell” in old English usage, before self-appointed “orthodox” theologians picked it up and gave it a new and special significance to suit their own purposes, simply meant to conceal, to hide, to cover; hence the concealed, hidden or covered place. In old English literature records may be found of the helling of potatoes — putting potatoes into pits; and of the helling of a house — covering or thatching it. The word hell was therefore properly used synonymously with the words “grave” and “pit,” to translate the words sheol and hades as signifying the secret or hidden condition of death. However, the same spirit which was willing to twist the word to terrorize the ignorant is willing still to perpetuate the error; — presumably saying — “Let us do evil that good may follow.” — Isaiah 5:20.

(20) Many translations transliterate the Hebrew word sheol and the Greek word hades, thus leaving it up to the reader as to what these words mean. It is possible that they may have been afraid to tell the truth, and ashamed to tell the lie; and so gave us sheol and hades transliterated, perhaps so that they could allow the inference that these words mean the same as the word “hell” has become perverted to mean. Some have claimed that in some places sheol means the grave and in other places, it means the place of torture. It is true that there are various shades of symbolism given to the Hebrew word sheol, but even so, the same basic meaning remains throughout the scriptures, as we have shown elsewhere. Others have even claimed that sheol contains various compartments, including paradise, limbo, purgatory and the inferno. Thus supposedly the immortal soul upon the death the person went to one of the compartments of sheol, according to what he had done in life. In examining these scriptures, as we will do later, we can see that these theories do not hold up.

(21) A peculiarity to be observed in comparing these cases, as we will do shortly, is that in those texts where the torment idea would be an absurdity the translators of the King James Version have used the words “grave” or “pit”; while in all other cases they have used the word “hell”; and the reader, long schooled in the traditionally accepted idea of torment in hell, reads the word “hell” and thinks of it as signifying a place of torment, instead of the grave, the hidden or covered place or condition. For example, compare Job 14:13 with Psalm 86:13. The former reads, — “Oh, that thou wouldst hide me in the grave [sheol] etc.,” while the latter reads, — “Thou hast delivered my soul from the lowest hell [sheol].” The Hebrew word being the same in both cases, there is no reason why the same word should not be used in both. except to satisfy extra-Biblical theology that has been blended into the Bible. But how absurd it would have been for Job to have prayed to God to hide him in a hell of eternal torture! The English reader would have asked questions and the secret would have gotten out speedily.

(22) We realize that the translators of the Reformation times are somewhat excusable for their mental bias in this matter, as they were just breaking away from the old Papal system. Many church leaders today have come forth with statements that are similar to what we present, yet many theological professors and pastors of congregations, not realizing the purpose for the call and selection of the seed of Abraham, still believe that they must keep the doctrine of eternal torture alive else their flock will no longer have the “fear of God” in them. Thus they feel they have to add much to the Bible that is not stated there in order to keep this doctrine viable. Many seem sincere in this, yet there are also many who appear to willfully ignore the truth. While attributing to the ignorant only the best of motives, it is manifestly only duplicity and cowardice which induces many educated men, who know the truth on this subject, to because of not having love for the truth (2 Thessalonians 2:11,21), prefer to continue to teach the error, even if done only inferentially.

(23) Nevertheless, not all ministers know of the errors of the translators, and deliberately cover and hide those errors from the people. Many, indeed, do not know of them, having merely accepted, without investigation, the theories of their seminary professors. It is the professors and learned ones who are most blameworthy. These have kept back the truth about “hell” for several reasons. First, there is evidently a sort of understanding or etiquette among them, that if they wish to maintain their standing in the “profession” they “must not tell tales out of school”; i.e., they must not divulge professional secrets to the “common people,” the “laity.” Second, they all fear that to let it be known that they have been teaching an unscriptural doctrine for years would break down the popular respect and reverence for the “clergy,” the denominations and the theological schools, and unsettle confidence in their wisdom. And, oh, how much depends upon confidence and reverence for men, when God’s Word is so generally ignored! Third, they know that many of the members of their sects are not constrained by “the love of Christ” (2 Corinthians 5:14), but merely by the fear of hell, and they see clearly, therefore, that to let the truth be known now would soon cut loose the names and the dollars of many in their flocks; and this, to those who “desire to make a fair show in the flesh” (Galatians 6:12) would seem to be a great calamity.

(24) But what will be the judgment of God, whose character and plan are traduced by the blasphemous doctrine that these untranslated words help to support? Will he commend these unfaithful servants? Will he justify their course? Will the Chief Shepherd call these his beloved friends, and make known to them his further plans (John 15:15) that they may misrepresent them also to preserve their own dignity and reverence? Will he continue to send forth “things new and old,” “food in due season,” to the household of faith, by the hand of the unfaithful servants? (Matthew 13:52; 24:45) No, such shall not continue to be his mouthpieces or to shepherd his flock. (Ezekiel 34:9,10) He will choose instead, as at the first advent, from among the laity — “the common people” — mouthpieces, and will give them words which none of the chief priests shall be able to gainsay or resist. (Luke 21:15) And, as foretold,”the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid.” — Isaiah 29:9-19.

SHEOL

(25) The only word used for “hell” in the Old Testament (the Hebrew Scriptures), is sheol (Strong’s Hebrew #7585). In the King James Version sheol is rendered “hell” thirty-one times, “grave” thirty-one times, and “pit” three times. The word “sheol” does not mean a lake of fire and brimstone, nor anything at all resembling that thought: not in the slightest degree! Quite the reverse: instead of a place of blazing fire it is described in the context as a state of “darkness” (Job 10:21) instead of a place where shrieks and groans are heard, it is described in the context as a place of “silence” (Psalm 115:17); instead of representing in any sense pain and suffering, or remorse, the context describes it as a place or condition of forgetfulness. (Psalm 88:11,12) “there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in Sheol, where you are going.” — Ecclesiastes 9:10.

(26) The meaning of sheol is “the hidden state,” as applied to man’s condition in death, in and beyond which all is hidden, except to the eye of faith; hence, by proper and close association, the word was often used in the sense of the grave–the tomb, the hidden place, or place beyond which only those who have the enlightened eye of the understanding can see the resurrection, restoration of consciousness. And be it particularly noted that this identical word sheol is translated “grave” thirty-one times and “pit” three times in King James Verison of the Bible — more times than it is translated “hell”; and twice, where it is translated “hell,” it seemed so absurd, according to the traditionally accepted meaning of the English word “hell,” that scholars have felt it necessary to explain in the margin of modern Bibles, that it means the grave. (Isaiah 14:9 and Jonah 2:2) In the latter case, the hidden state, or the grave, was the belly of the fish in which Jonah was buried alive, and from which he cried to God.

(27) There are various views concerning sheol and how it should be rendered: (1) Many represent sheol is a great abyss of fire and terrors, where the wicked will be tortured for all eternity; (2) many claim that sheol sometimes represents paradise, and sometimes represents the fiery abyss of eternal torture, and sometimes the unconscious condition of the physical body in death; (3) others clam that sheol is made up of two or more compartments, one of which is the inferno of eternal torture, another of which is paradise, and others add purgatory, a temporary place of torture and limbo (usually advocates of this view claim that paradise was removed from sheol and taken to heaven when Jesus ascended to heaven.); (4) still others claim that sheol is the oblivious, unconscious condition of the soul in death, that is, sheol is the realm of oblivious death. It is this latter view that our studies have found to be supported by scripture.

(28) Concerning the word “sheol”, Appendix 35 of The Companion Bible states:

It occurs sixty-five times in the Hebrew of the Old Testament; and only by studying each passage by itself can the student hope to gather the Biblical usage of the word. All heathen or traditional usages are not only worthless, but mischievous…. As meaning “THE grave,” it is to be distinguished from keber, A grave, or burying-place (from kabar, to bury, first occurrence Genesis 23:4): and bõr, a pit, generally hewn in the rock, hence used of a cistern (Genesis 37:20) or a dungeon, and etc., when dry.

(29) In the New Testament, which was written in Koine Greek, the Hebrew word SHEOL is translated as HADES (transliterated — not to be confused with the Greek god called by the name Hades). We are in the process of presenting a short examination of all places in the Bible where sheol and hades appear in the Bible: Sheol and Hades in the Bible.

God willing, we may to return to this add more concerning Gehenna, the lake of fire, eternal punishment, the second death, paradise and more. One can, however, see links to many other related studies at: Life After Death.

Ronald R. Day, Sr.




No comments:

Russell and "Organized Religion"

By Ronald R. Day, Sr. Walter Martin and Norman Klann make the claim that, as a result of Charles Taze Russell's alleged rejection of th...